Improving Biology Learning Outcomes through Guided Inquiry with Video Media

Ruth Rize Paas Megahati S (1)
(1) Politeknik Kesehatan, Lampung, Indonesia

Abstract

Lack of student participation during discussions causes students to become inactive when learning, and difficulty in answering teacher questions because the information the teacher conveys is not understood by students. This results in student scores still below the KKM in Global warming is one of them. The minimum completeness criteria set at SMPN 2 Lembah Gumanti is 65. The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of the application of the guided inquiry model with video media on the biology learning outcomes of seventh-grade students of SMPN 2 Lembah Gumanti, Solok Regency. The type of research is an experiment with a research design Randomized Control Group Posttest Only Design. The use of t-test is used in the affective domain as a data analysis technique and the t-test was used in the cognitive and psychomotor domains for data analysis techniques. 1 the experimental class has an average score of 62.38 with a predicate of C (Enough) while the control class has an average value of 53.22 with a predicate of D (Less).  Hypothesis test 0.05 obtained t-count 2.90 > t-table 1.67, meaning that H1 is accepted. The guided inquiry learning model accompanied by video media can improve the biology learning outcomes of class VII students of SMPN 2 Lembah Gumanti, Solok Regency.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Alalwan, N. (2022). Actual use of social media for engagement to enhance students’ learning. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9767–9789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11014-7

Ana, N. Y. (2019). Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Dalam Peningkatan Hasil Belajaran Siswa Di Sekolah Dasar. Pedagogi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 18(2), 56. https://doi.org/10.24036/fip.100.v18i2.318.000-000

Bali, N. (2016). The No-Participation of Students in Physical Education: A Comparative Study of Tunisian Trainee Teachers. Creative Education, 07(10), 1486–1499. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.710154

Bergdahl, N. (2022). Engagement and disengagement in online learning. Computers & Education, 188, 104561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104561

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Gkrimpizi, T., Peristeras, V., & Magnisalis, I. (2023). Classification of Barriers to Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions: Systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences, 13(7), 746. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070746

Gulzar, M. A., Ahmad, M., Hassan, M., & Rasheed, M. I. (2022). How social media use is related to student engagement and creativity: Investigating through the lens of intrinsic motivation. Behavior & Information Technology, 41(11), 2283–2293. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1917660

Hattie, J. A. C., & Donoghue, G. M. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. Npj Science of Learning, 1(1), 16013. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.13

Jerrim, J., Oliver, M., & Sims, S. (2022). The relationship between inquiry-based teaching and students’ achievement. New evidence from a longitudinal PISA study in England. Learning and Instruction, 80, 101310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101310

Jirout, J. J., Zumbrunn, S., Evans, N. S., & Vitiello, V. E. (2022). Development and Testing of the Curiosity in Classrooms Framework and Coding Protocol. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 875161. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875161

Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6

Lari, F. S. (2014). The Impact of Using PowerPoint Presentations on Students’ Learning and Motivation in Secondary Schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1672–1677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.592

Malhi, G. S., Kaur, M., & Kaushik, P. (2021). Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture and Its Mitigation Strategies: A Review. Sustainability, 13(3), 1318. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031318

Manu, B. D., Ying, F., Oduro, D., & Boateng, S. A. (2021). Student engagement and social media in tertiary education: The perception and experience from the Ghanaian public university. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100100

Mustapha, S. M., Rahman, N. S. N. A., & Md.Yunus, M. (2010). Factors influencing classroom participation: A case study of Malaysian undergraduate students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1079–1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.289

Pamungkas, T. D. (2020). Android-based augmented reality media and the curiosity about mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1663(1), 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1663/1/012016

Sivakumar, A., Jayasingh, S., & Shaik, S. (2023). Social Media Influence on Students’ Knowledge Sharing and Learning: An Empirical Study. Education Sciences, 13(7), 745. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070745

Sohel-Uz-Zaman, A. S. Md., & Anjalin, U. (2016). Implementing Total Quality Management in Education: Compatibility and Challenges. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 04(11), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2016.411017

Thornberg, R., Forsberg, C., Hammar Chiriac, E., & Bjereld, Y. (2022). Teacher–Student Relationship Quality and Student Engagement: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed-Methods Study. Research Papers in Education, 37(6), 840–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1864772

Wati, Y., & Sartiman, S. (2019). Discovery Learning: Pengaruhnya Terhadap Hasil Belajar. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v2i1.3981

Zhang, B. (2023). The Relationship Between Teacher-Student Rapport and EFL Learners’ Engagement in Online Scaffolding Setting. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(5), 1685–1705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09954-3

Authors

Ruth Rize Paas Megahati S
megahati71@gmail.com (Primary Contact)

Article Details

Most read articles by the same author(s)