Bridging the Tactile Gap: Evaluating Virtual Reality (VR) Laboratories in Distance Life-Science Curricula
Article Sidebar
-
Virtual reality, distance education, life-science curricula, tactile gap, cognitive load theory, immersive learning.
Abstract
The persistent expanding trajectory of distance education within higher biological sciences has encountered structural friction regarding the "tactile gap"—the systemic inability of remote students to acquire manual laboratory competencies, sensory-spatial familiarization, and procedural confidence through flat, two-dimensional digital interfaces. This literature review evaluates the implementation of Virtual Reality (VR) laboratories as an immersive instructional solution within distance life-science curricula. The objective is to synthesize evidence regarding VR's impact on conceptual retention, cognitive load, and spatial-procedural skill acquisition, while critically analyzing infrastructural barriers and pedagogical integration frameworks. Employing a comprehensive review framework encompassing 50 major studies from 2020 to 2026, the findings demonstrate that high-fidelity, fully immersive VR environments achieve a statistically significant equivalent or superior conceptual gain compared to conventional brick-and-mortar laboratories. Crucially, VR effectively mitigates intrinsic cognitive load by chunking complex macromolecular structures, though it introduces risks of extraneous load via cyber-sickness. The review identifies a critical transition from isolated VR software towards hybrid, AI-augmented, and cloud-rendered ecosystems. We propose a "Tactile-Immersive Scaffolding Framework" to guide distance educators in balancing experiential realism with digital accessibility, establishing that VR does not dilute academic rigor but structurally expands the democratization of experiential scientific education.
Full text article
References
Albus, P., & Seufert, T. (2022). Signaling in 360° Desktop Virtual Reality Influences Learning Outcome and Cognitive Load. Frontiers in Education, 7, 916105. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.916105
Barbu, M., Iordache, D.-D., Petre, I., Barbu, D.-C., & Băjenaru, L. (2025). Framework Design for Reinforcing the Potential of XR Technologies in Transforming Inclusive Education. Applied Sciences, 15(3), 1484. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031484
Bonde, M. T., Makransky, G., Wandall, J., Larsen, M. V., Morsing, M., Jarmer, H., & Sommer, M. O. A. (2014). Improving biotech education through gamified laboratory simulations. Nature Biotechnology, 32(7), 694–697. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2955
Chang, Y., & Brickman, P. (2018). When Group Work Doesn’t Work: Insights from Students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(3), ar52. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-09-0199
Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3‐D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x
De Vries, L. E., & May, M. (2019). Virtual laboratory simulation in the education of laboratory technicians–motivation and study intensity. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 47(3), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21221
Deliktas, B. (2011). Computer technology for enhancing teaching and learning modules of engineering mechanics. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 19(3), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20321
Deriba, F. G., Saqr, M., & Tukiainen, M. (2024). Assessment of accessibility in virtual laboratories: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1351711. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1351711
Dyrberg, N. R., Treusch, A. H., & Wiegand, C. (2017). Virtual laboratories in science education: Students’ motivation and experiences in two tertiary biology courses. Journal of Biological Education, 51(4), 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1257498
Gabia, C. C., Gabia, D., Villa Jr., S. C., Villa, B. M., Nolon, N. F., Mamites, I., & Himang, M. M. (2026). Assessing the Critical Failure Factors of AI Chatbots for Research Using ISM Approach: A Case of Philippine State University Researchers. International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies, 22(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJIIT.402395
Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, 59(1), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0822-x
Ge, X., Qin, R., & Zi, X. (2026). Attention mechanism-enhanced virtual reality scene generation for innovation and entrepreneurship education with cognitive load balancing. Scientific Reports, 16(1), 21373. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-52481-z
Howard, M. C. (2017). A meta-analysis and systematic literature review of virtual reality rehabilitation programs. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.013
Lakshmanan, A., Heath, B. P., Perlmutter, A., & Elder, M. (2011). The impact of science content and professional learning communities on science teaching efficacy and standards‐based instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 534–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20404
Lamb, R., Lin, J., & Firestone, J. B. (2020). Virtual Reality Laboratories: A Way Forward for Schools? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(6), em1856. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8206
Llanos-Ruiz, D., Abella-García, V., & Ausín-Villaverde, V. (2025). Virtual Reality in Higher Education: A Systematic Review Aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals. Societies, 15(9), 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15090251
Makransky, G., Andreasen, N. K., Baceviciute, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2021). Immersive virtual reality increases liking but not learning with a science simulation and generative learning strategies promote learning in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 719–735. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000473
Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T. S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019a). Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learning and Instruction, 60, 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.007
Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T. S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019b). Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learning and Instruction, 60, 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.007
Mallillin, L. L. (2025). Teaching Strategy Theory for Effective Classroom Setting. Journal Of Digital Learning And Distance Education, 4(7), 1765–1785. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v4i7.608
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
Megahati S, R. R. P. (2026). Virtual Reality as A Digital Learning Innovation to Enhance the Skills of Students: A Systematic Review. Journal Of Digital Learning And Distance Education, 4(10), 1961–1976. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v4i10.676
Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033
Mithun Ramakrishnappa, Archana Manjegowda, Maltesh Shripadrao Kulkarni, & Varsha Tindlu Rajgopal. (2025). An Analytical Study of Augmented and Virtual Reality in Online Learning: Exploring Technological Advancements and Pedagogical Impacts. Journal Of Digital Learning And Distance Education, 4(7), 1791–1800. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v4i7.677
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments: Special Issue on Interactive Learning Environments: Contemporary Issues and Trends. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Learning science in virtual reality multimedia environments: Role of methods and media. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 598–610. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.598
Mufit, F., Hendriyani, Y., & Dhanil, M. (2024). Design immersive virtual reality (IVR) with cognitive conflict to support practical learning of quantum physics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 2. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.020
Parong, J., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). Learning science in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 785–797. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000241
Petersen, G. B., Petkakis, G., & Makransky, G. (2022). A study of how immersion and interactivity drive VR learning. Computers & Education, 179, 104429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104429
Pletz, C., & Zinn, B. (2020). Evaluation of an immersive virtual learning environment for operator training in mechanical and plant engineering using video analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2159–2179. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13024
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
Radu, I. (2014). Augmented reality in education: A meta-review and cross-media analysis. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), 1533–1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0747-y
Refmidawati. (2023). Virtual Reality Media for Fun Learning. Journal Of Digital Learning And Distance Education, 2(4), 544–547. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v2i4.79
Seifert, A., & Schlomann, A. (2021). The Use of Virtual and Augmented Reality by Older Adults: Potentials and Challenges. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 2, 639718. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2021.639718
Sellberg, C., Nazari, Z., & Solberg, M. (2024). Virtual Laboratories in STEM Higher Education: A Scoping Review. Nordic Journal of Systematic Reviews in Education, 2. https://doi.org/10.23865/njsre.v2.5766
Siemens, G., & Baker, R. S. J. D. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 252–254. https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330661
Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
Sydow, M., Chrzanowski, Ł., Leclerc, A., Laurent, A., & Owsianiak, M. (2018). Terrestrial Ecotoxic Impacts Stemming from Emissions of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn from Manure: A Spatially Differentiated Assessment in Europe. Sustainability, 10(11), 4094. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114094
Wu, H.-K., Lee, S. W.-Y., Chang, H.-Y., & Liang, J.-C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024
Zhang, Y., Yang, Y., Chu, Y., Sun, D., Xu, J., & Zheng, Y. (2024). Virtual Laboratories In Science Education: Unveiling Trajectories, Themes, And Emerging Paradigms (2013-2023). Journal of Baltic Science Education, 23(5), 990–1009. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/24.23.990
Authors
Copyright (c) 2026 JOURNAL OF DIGITAL LEARNING AND DISTANCE EDUCATION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>.