Comprehensive Guided Inquiry Learning Model through Digital Concepts for Aquaculture Students: A Review
Article Sidebar
-
learning models/strategies, chemistry learning outcomes, guided inquiry model
Abstract
The abstract nature of the topics is easily understood while learning chemistry through guided inquiry. This article employs the A Review (SLR) technique to review eleven papers released between 2018 and 2023 that deal with teaching chemistry using various guided inquiry models. Three online article databases—ERIC, Scopus, and Google Scholar—were used to retrieve articles methodically. The information in this review will be helpful to educators and researchers who work in chemical education in understanding guided inquiry models, how they impact chemical learning outcomes, and how to apply them to improve students' comprehension of chemistry. The review's conclusions show how various guided inquiry strategies immerse students in a problem, offer them an investigation to work through and provide guidance on how to solve the problem. Guided inquiry models influence chemistry learning outcomes by enhancing metacognition, concept understanding, critical thinking skills, science process skills, learning outcomes, creative thinking abilities, and reducing misconceptions. Many learning models or strategies, including guided inquiry, guided inquiry-based on blended learning, guided inquiry-based on the flipped classroom, guided inquiry model integrated with STEM, and guided inquiry and task hierarchy analysis model in cooperative learning strategy, have also used different chemistry learning models.
Full text article
References
Ali, M. T., Lykknes, A., & Tiruneh, D. T. (2023). Examining the Effects of Supervised Laboratory Instruction on Students’ Motivation and Their Understanding of Chemistry. Education Sciences, 13(8), 798. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080798
Barendsen, E., & Henze, I. (2019). Relating Teacher PCK and Teacher Practice Using Classroom Observation. Research in Science Education, 49(5), 1141–1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9637-z
Becker, S., Klein, P., Gößling, A., & Kuhn, J. (2020). Using mobile devices to enhance inquiry-based learning processes. Learning and Instruction, 69, 101350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101350
Burhanuddin, Azizah, U., & Ibrahim, M. (2019). Improving critical thinking skills of preservice chemistry teacher through writing assignments. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1307(1), 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1307/1/012018
Cornelio, C., Dash, S., Austel, V., Josephson, T. R., Goncalves, J., Clarkson, K. L., Megiddo, N., El Khadir, B., & Horesh, L. (2023). Combining data and theory for derivable scientific discovery with AI-Descartes. Nature Communications, 14(1), 1777. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37236-y
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the Future of Education: Exploring the Potential and Consequences of AI and ChatGPT in Educational Settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Ho, D. G. E., Sa’adi, M., He, D., & Hoon, C.-Y. (2023). Silence over the wire: Student verbal participation and the virtual classroom in the digital era. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24(4), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09834-4
Juliana, N. O., Hui, H. J., Clement, M., Solomon, E. N., & Elvis, O. K. (2021). The Impact of Creativity and Innovation on Entrepreneurship Development: Evidence from Nigeria. Open Journal of Business and Management, 09(04), 1743–1770. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2021.94095
Lombardi, L., Mednick, F. J., De Backer, F., & Lombaerts, K. (2021). Fostering Critical Thinking across the Primary School’s Curriculum in the European Schools System. Education Sciences, 11(9), 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090505
Mao, Q., Feng, M., Jiang, X. Z., Ren, Y., Luo, K. H., & Van Duin, A. C. T. (2023). Classical and reactive molecular dynamics: Principles and applications in combustion and energy systems. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 97, 101084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2023.101084
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Raja Santhi, A., & Muthuswamy, P. (2023). Industry 5.0 or Industry 4.0S? Introduction to Industry 4.0 and a Peek into the prospective Industry 5.0 technologies. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 17(2), 947–979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-023-01217-8
Raslan, G. (2023). Critical Thinking Skills Profile of High School Students in AP Chemistry Learning. In K. Al Marri, F. Mir, S. David, & A. Aljuboori (Eds.), BUiD Doctoral Research Conference 2022 (Vol. 320, pp. 79–96). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27462-6_8
Sellars, M., Fakirmohammad, R., Bui, L., Fishetti, J., Niyozov, S., Reynolds, R., Thapliyal, N., Smith, Y., & Ali, N. (2018). Conversations on Critical Thinking: Can Critical Thinking Find Its Way Forward as the Skill Set and Mindset of the Century? Education Sciences, 8(4), 205. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040205
Senisum, M., Susilo, H., Suwono, H., & Ibrohim. (2022). GIReSiMCo: A Learning Model to Scaffold Students’ Science Process Skills and Biology Cognitive Learning Outcomes. Education Sciences, 12(4), 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040228
Strat, T. T. S., Henriksen, E. K., & Jegstad, K. M. (2023). Inquiry-based science education in science teacher education: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 1–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2207148
Wilson, K. (2016). Critical reading, critical thinking: Delicate scaffolding in English for Academic Purposes (EAP). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.002
Yunianti, A. U., Wasis, & Nur, M. (2019). The Effectiveness of Guided Inquiry Learning Model to Improve Science Process Skill on Heat Matter. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417(1), 012080. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012080
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL OF DIGITAL LEARNING AND DISTANCE EDUCATION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>.