Inclusive Instructional Design for Neurodiverse Learners
Article Sidebar
-
Equity, Inclusion, Instructional Design, Neurodiversity
Abstract
The variations in the cognitive processes through which neurodiverse learners perceive, acquire knowledge, and engage with their surroundings are construed as inherent cognitive diversity, analogous to the biodiversity observed in the natural ecosystem. These variations are a mix of distinctive abilities and difficulties for learners. Consequently, there is a need for interventions aimed at establishing inclusive learning environments through instructional design that will help neurodivergent learners excel in learning environments. Inclusion and equity in education may remain mere statements if it fails to focus on infusing teaching with support and resources to a broad spectrum of learners which includes neurodivergent learners. Neurodiversity refers to the natural variation in human brain function and the resulting differences in how individuals learn, process information, and interact with the world. This spectrum encompasses a wide range of conditions, each with its own unique set of strengths and needs. This paper explores how instructional design can be inclusive and aligned to create a supportive learning environment for neurodiverse learners to foster equity in education. This literature-based approach adopts Vygotsky Social Constructionist Theory, which envision an inclusive model for special learners. The study concludes that by recognizing and accommodating the unique differences of these learners, adopting inclusive instructional design can help unlock the potential of neurodiverse learners and create a more inclusive learning environment.
Full text article
References
Asbell-Clarke, J., Dahlstrom-Hakki, I., Voiklis, J., Attaway, B., Barchas-Lichtenstein, J., Edwards, T., Bardar, E., Robillard, T., Paulson, K., Grover, S., Israel, M., Ke, F., & Weintrop, D. (2024). Including neurodiversity in computational thinking. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1358492. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1358492
Azhar, A. (2022). Student Process Skills on Temperature and Heat Materials. Journal of Digital Learning and Distance Education, 1(4), 140–145. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v1i4.29
Berman, N. (2020). A critical examination of informal learning spaces. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(1), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1670147
Burgstahler, S. (2018). Inclusive Online Science Education: What Teachers Need to Know. In M. Koomen, S. Kahn, C. L. Atchison, & T. A. Wild (Eds.), Towards Inclusion of All Learners through Science Teacher Education (pp. 115–123). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368422_013
Cherewick, M., & Matergia, M. (2024). Neurodiversity in Practice: A Conceptual Model of Autistic Strengths and Potential Mechanisms of Change to Support Positive Mental Health and Wellbeing in Autistic Children and Adolescents. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 8(3), 408–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-023-00348-z
Chrysochoou, M., Zaghi, A. E., & Syharat, C. M. (2022). Reframing neurodiversity in engineering education. Frontiers in Education, 7, 995865. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.995865
Clouder, L., Karakus, M., Cinotti, A., Ferreyra, M. V., Fierros, G. A., & Rojo, P. (2020). Neurodiversity in higher education: A narrative synthesis. Higher Education, 80(4), 757–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00513-6
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Doyle, N., & McDowall, A. (2022). Diamond in the rough? An “empty review” of research into “neurodiversity” and a road map for developing the inclusion agenda. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 41(3), 352–382. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-06-2020-0172
Garrett, C. (2022). “There is beauty in diversity in all areas of life including neurological diversity” (Bella): A mixed method study into how new thoughts on neurodiversity are influencing psychotherapists’ practice. Zeitschrift Für Psychodrama Und Soziometrie, 21(S1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11620-021-00638-5
Goldberg, H. (2023). Unraveling Neurodiversity: Insights from Neuroscientific Perspectives. Encyclopedia, 3(3), 972–980. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3030070
Higbee, J. L., Schultz, J. L., & Goff, E. (2010). Pedagogy of Inclusion: Integrated Multicultural Instructional Design. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2010.10850335
Kurzeja, O., Flynn, S., Grindle, C. F., Sutherland, D., & Hastings, R. P. (2024). Teaching Reading Skills to Individuals with Autism and/or Intellectual Disabilities Using Computer-Assisted Instruction: A Systematic Review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-024-00465-y
Lindner, K.-T., & Schwab, S. (2020). Differentiation and individualisation in inclusive education: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1813450
Liu, J. (2021). Inclusiveness in Instructional Design & Development of Informal Learning Experiences: From Cultural Lenses. Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.51869/103/jcl
Molina Roldán, S., Marauri, J., Aubert, A., & Flecha, R. (2021). How Inclusive Interactive Learning Environments Benefit Students Without Special Needs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 661427. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661427
Nzuza, Z. D. (2023). Strategies for creating inclusive learning for learners experiencing barriers to learning. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 9(2), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v9i2.64913
Rao, K. (2021). Inclusive Instructional Design: Applying UDL to Online Learning. Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.51869/101/kr
Salisbury, Y., Foster, R., Hill, S., & Buck, G. (2024). Neurodiverse inclusive social work education is considered through a student partnership. Social Work Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2024.2378915
Sharma, S., Achary, K., Kinnula, M., Norouzi, B., Kinnula, H., Iivari, N., Ventä-Olkkonen, L., & Holappa, J. (2022). To Empower or Provoke? Exploring approaches for participatory design at schools for neurodiverse individuals in India. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 34, 100521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100521
Siregar, H. (2023). Improving Students’ Learning Outcome in Mathematics with Brainstorming Model. Journal of Digital Learning and Distance Education, 1(10), 325–331. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v1i10.96
Yeh, C., Sugita, T., & Tan, P. (2020). Reimagining Inclusive Spaces for Mathematics Learning. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12, 113(9), 708–714. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTLT.2019.0101
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 JOURNAL OF DIGITAL LEARNING AND DISTANCE EDUCATION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>.