Developing a Curriculum for Non-Native Speakers of Arabic: Employing Thuaimah's Model as a Prototype

K. M. A. AHAMED ZUBAIR (1)
(1) Postgraduate and Research Department of Arabic, The New College, Chennai, India., India

Abstract

Teaching Arabic to non-native speakers faces various difficulties, such as curriculum design, environment, and other things. Attention should be focused on the design of suitable Arabic language teaching curricula for non-native speakers. Curricula are a vital component in the Arabic language for achieving academic objectives. The researcher aimed to understand the written texts as reflections of the author's ideas by describing and analyzing them. The researcher aimed to understand the written texts as reflections of the author's ideas by describing and analyzing them. This differs significantly between native and non-native speakers, requiring unique approaches for non-native speakers. The data, related to the curriculum concepts, are derived from Rushdi Ahmed Thuaimah's books using a documentation method. Thuaimah considered the curriculum as a system of interconnected elements. His teaching curriculum is based on philosophical foundations, namely behavioral, structural, pragmatic, and Islamic. These philosophies impact all the underlying foundations, such as linguistic, educational, psychological, and social foundations. The model for curriculum elements in teaching Arabic to non-native speakers by Thuaima consists of objectives, content, method, evaluation, and the teacher's guide. This indicates that the elements of the curriculum align and evolve based on expert input.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Al Tale, M. (2023). Future Saudi female teachers’ perceptions of native-like English pronunciation and English as a Lingua Franca. Saudi Journal of Language Studies, 3(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJLS-07-2022-0062

Bahtilla, M., & Xu, H. (2021). The Influence of Confucius’s Educational Thoughts on China’s Educational System. OALib, 08(05), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107370

Basten, D., & Haamann, T. (2018). Approaches for Organizational Learning: A Literature Review. SAGE Open, 8(3), 215824401879422. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018794224

Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001

Calafato, R. (2019). The non-native speaker teacher as proficient multilingual: A critical review of research from 2009–2018. Lingua, 227, 102700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.06.001

Dajani, B. A. S., Mubaideen, S., & Omari, F. M. A. (2014). Difficulties of Learning Arabic for Non-native Speakers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 114, 919–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.808

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the Future of Education: Exploring the Potential and Consequences of AI and ChatGPT in Educational Settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Hargreaves, E., Quick, L., & Buchanan, D. (2023). National Curriculum and Assessment in England and the continuing narrowed experiences of lower-attainers in primary schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 55(5), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2253455

Hopmann, S. (2023). The Curriculum as a Standard of Public Education. In T. S. Prøitz, P. Aasen, & W. Wermke (Eds.), From Education Policy to Education Practice (Vol. 15, pp. 93–108). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36970-4_6

Kamalov, F., Santandreu Calonge, D., & Gurrib, I. (2023). New Era of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Towards a Sustainable Multifaceted Revolution. Sustainability, 15(16), 12451. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612451

Kim, D. (2020). Learning Language, Learning Culture: Teaching Language to the Whole Student. ECNU Review of Education, 3(3), 519–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120936693

Kioupi, V., & Voulvoulis, N. (2019). Education for Sustainable Development: A Systemic Framework for Connecting the SDGs to Educational Outcomes. Sustainability, 11(21), 6104. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216104

Maskor, Z. M., Baharudin, H., Lubis, M. A., & Yusuf, N. K. (2016). Teaching and Learning Arabic Vocabulary: From a Teacher’s Experiences. Creative Education, 07(03), 482–490. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.73049

Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: What works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007

Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., & Ngan, L. K. (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning on students’ academic achievement, self-study skills and learning attitudes: A quasi-experiment study in teaching the conventions for coordinates in the plane. Heliyon, 8(12), e12657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12657

Yakovleva, N. O., & Yakovlev, E. V. (2014). Interactive teaching methods in contemporary higher education. Pacific Science Review, 16(2), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscr.2014.08.016

Yeboah, A. (2023). Knowledge sharing in organization: A systematic review. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2195027. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2195027

Yemini, M., Engel, L., & Ben Simon, A. (2023). Place-based education – a systematic review of literature. Educational Review, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2023.2177260

Authors

K. M. A. AHAMED ZUBAIR
ahamedzubair@thenewcollege.edu.in (Primary Contact)

Article Details