This or That? Perception of Filipino Generation Z and Generation Alpha in Using Common Emojis: Semantics and Typology
Article Sidebar
-
This or That Emoji, Generation Z and Alpha, Semantics, Typology, Digital Communication
Abstract
Emojis have become integral to digital communication, functioning as visual cues that convey emotion, intent, and social meaning beyond literal text. Guided by Semiotic Theory, this research investigates generational differences in how Filipino Generation Z and Generation Alpha perceive and classify common emojis in terms of semantics and typology. A convergent parallel mixed methods design was employed, involving surveys and structured interviews with 16 students equally distributed between the two generations. Quantitative results from the Chi-Square Test of Independence indicated a statistically significant generational difference in emoji usage (χ² = 26.74, p < 0.05). Qualitative thematic analysis revealed that Gen Z frequently interprets emojis symbolically or sarcastically utilizing them to signal passive-aggression, express exaggerated humor, or convey disapproval. In contrast, Gen Alpha tends to assign more literal and emotionally transparent meanings to the same icons. Despite the limited sample size restricting broad generalizability, the findings demonstrate distinct generational patterns in digital expression. These differences suggest potential sources of miscommunication in online and educational environments. The study recommends the development of a digital literacy toolkit to foster generational awareness and promote clearer, more empathetic emoji-mediated communication.
Full text article
References
Agsalud, Z. L., Berja, C. M., Ecarwan, M. A., Leuterio, G. A., Manansala, M. M., & Sanchez, C. D. (2022). Thıs or that: The perceptıons of Fılıpıno Mıllennıals and Generatıon Z on using common emojis. Certo Eruditio, 44–79. https://gordoncollege.edu.ph
Akpan, V. P., & Shogeyinbo, M. (2024). An Analysis Of Emoji As Used On WhatsApp And Facebook Messenger By The Students Of The University Of Lagos. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21906.06084
Aranas, K. K. S., Marte, M. B., Valentin, C. J. S., & Biray, E. T. (2024). Emojis serve as a communication medium among college students in a state-run institution. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(8), 3349–3356. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.08.30
Azad, I., Chhibber, S., & Tajhizi, A. (2023). How Do Different Generations Communicate on Social Media? A Comparative Analysis of Language Styles, Emoji Usage, and Visual Elements. Language, Technology, and Social Media, 1(2), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.70211/ltsm.v1i2.61
Beck, K. (2024). Study population. In Translational Orthopedics (pp. 97–100). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85663-8.00066-0
Boutet, I., LeBlanc, M., Chamberland, J. A., & Collin, C. A. (2021). Emojis influence emotional communication, social attributions, and information processing. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, 106722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106722
Brijesh, D. (2023). The Influence of Demographic Factors on Emoji Usage and Perception. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.24079203
Brooks, H., Bee, P., & Rogers, A. (2018). Introduction to qualitative data analysis. In P. Bee, H. Brooks, P. Callaghan, & K. Lovell (Eds.), A research handbook for patient and public involvement researchers. Manchester University Press. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526136527.00013
Cappello, M. (2022). Visual Literacy. In Visual Literacy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781138609877-REE97-1
Chiang, C., & Gomez-Zara, D. (2024). The Evolution of Emojis for Sharing Emotions: A Systematic Review of the HCI Literature (Version 1). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2409.17322
Erle, T. M., Schmid, K., Goslar, S. H., & Martin, J. D. (2022). Emojis as social information in digital communication. Emotion, 22(7), 1529–1543. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000992
Helvira, J., Geltri Sutra Purba, Ayudira, Honey Christine, & Rani Syahfitri. (2024). “The Role of Gender and Age in the Use of Emoji on Social Medai Among Millenials and Gen Z.” LINGUISTICA, 13(4), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.24114/jalu.v13i4.64954
Jayatissa, K. A. D. U. (2023). Generation Z – A New Lifeline: A Systematic Literature Review. Sri Lanka Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.4038/sljssh.v3i2.110
Kelmaganbetova, A., Mazhitayeva, S., Ayazbayeva, B., Khamzina, G., Ramazanova, Z., Rahymberlina, S., & Kadyrov, Z. (2023). The Role of Gestures in Communication. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(10), 2506–2513. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1310.09
Mahyoob, M., & Algaraady, J. (2021). Social Network Communication: Emojis and EFL learners’ Writing Issues. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/nbu8y
Marzona, Y. (2025). Language Change in the Communication of Generation Z. Jurnal Ilmiah Langue and Parole, 8(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.36057/jilp.v8i2.734
Roy, M., Das, S., Majumder, T., & Ray, N. (2025). EVOLVING WORKPLACE PRIORITIES: A STUDY ON GEN Z’S CORE VALUES. International Journal of Advances in Business and Management Research, 03(01), 01–11. https://doi.org/10.62674/ijabmr.2025.v3i01.001
Sun, J., Lasser, S., & Lee, S. K. (2023). Understanding emojis: Cultural influences in interpretation and choice of emojis. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 16(3), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2022.2036790
Surya, A. (2025). Peta Teori Semiotika Serta Aplikasi Dalam Penelitian Komunikasi Dakwah. Bil Hikmah: Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran Islam, 3(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.55372/bilhikmahjkpi.v3i1.53
Udoudom, U., William, G., Igiri, A., Okon, E., & Aruku, K. (2024). Emojis and Miscommunication in Text-Based Interactions Among Nigerian Youths. Journal of Informatics and Web Engineering, 3(1), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.33093/jiwe.2024.3.1.15
Viana, M. N. R. (2025). Experiências com mídias digitais e linguagem visual junto aos estudantes. EaD & Tecnologias Digitais Na Educação, 12(16), 216–221. https://doi.org/10.30612/eadtde.v14i16.18923
von Hedemann, N. (2025). 38. Sampling. In R. Lave & S. Lane (Eds.), Critical Physical Geography: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Nature, Power and Politics (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 543–548). Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0418.38
Zhou, Y., & Creswell, J. W. (2012). The use of mixed methods by Chinese scholars in East China: A case study. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 6(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2012.6.1.73
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL OF DIGITAL LEARNING AND DISTANCE EDUCATION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>.