Humanism and Constructivism Learning Theories (Their Application in Islamic Religious Education Learning)
Article Sidebar
-
Learning Theory, Humanism, Constructivism, Islamic Religious Education
Abstract
Humanistic learning theory emphasizes the importance of human aspects in the educational process. Meanwhile, constructivism focuses on the process of how students build knowledge and understanding through experience and interaction with their environment. Both of these theories are essential for educators to understand as a foundation for implementing learning activities. Based on previous research, it seems that there has been no research that examines Humanism and Constructivism Learning Theories (Their Application in Islamic Religious Education Learning) especially literature review research. The purpose of this study is to identify and highlight several publications that examine how humanism and constructivism learning theories (their application in islamic religious education learning). This research uses a literature review, where data is collected from scholarly writings or literature. The findings indicate that in humanistic learning theory, this approach encourages educators to consider students' needs, interests, and motivations, making the learning process more personal and meaningful. Meanwhile, constructivist theory helps students connect religious teachings to daily life, making the material more relevant and applicable. The integration of both theories in Islamic Religious Education (PAI) learning practice can create a holistic learning experience. This will contribute to the development of strong character and deep spiritual understanding in students.
Full text article
References
Afandi, R., & Ningsih, P. N. (2023). The Implementation of the Humanistic Learning Model in the Learning of Islamic Religious Education in Junior High School. Scaffolding: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Dan Multikulturalisme, 5(2), 526–542. https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v5i2.3136
Ainjärv, H., & Laas, K. (2024). Applying constructivism in driving teacher education: Analysis based on transcripts of videotaped lessons. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 100, 346–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.12.004
Bosch, N., Härkki, T., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2025). Teachers as reflective learning experience designers: Bringing design thinking into school-based design and maker education. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 43, 100695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.100695
Darling-Hammond, L., Schachner, A. C. W., Wojcikiewicz, S. K., & Flook, L. (2024). Educating teachers to enact the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 28(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2022.2130506
De Jong, L., Meirink, J., & Admiraal, W. (2022). School-based collaboration as a learning context for teachers: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101927
Do, H.-N., Do, B. N., & Nguyen, M. H. (2023). 3How do constructivism learning environments generate better motivation and learning strategies? The Design Science Approach. Heliyon, 9(12), e22862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22862
Dong, A., Jong, M. S.-Y., & King, R. B. (2020). How Does Prior Knowledge Influence Learning Engagement? The Mediating Roles of Cognitive Load and Help-Seeking. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 591203. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591203
Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., Van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004
González Hernández, W. (2022). The Teaching-Learning Process or the Teaching Process and the Learning Process. Culture & Psychology, 1354067X2210976. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X221097610
Gusmaweti, Rigel Prima Sari, & Enjoni. (2023). Application of Problem-Based Learning with Video Assistance to The Learning Outcomes of Science from Students in Class V Elementary. Journal of Digital Learning and Distance Education, 1(12), 387–394. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v1i12.107
Kaufman, S. B. (2023). Self-Actualizing People in the 21st Century: Integration with Contemporary Theory and Research on Personality and Well-Being. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 63(1), 51–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167818809187
Khan, H., Rehmat, M., Butt, T. H., Farooqi, S., & Asim, J. (2020). Impact of transformational leadership on work performance, burnout and social loafing: A mediation model. Future Business Journal, 6(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-020-00043-8
Marvell, A. (2018). Student experiences of facilitating knowledge exchange: Developing an understanding of responsible events through blog writing. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 23, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2018.04.002
Oeschger, T. P., Makarova, E., & Döring, A. K. (2022). Values in the School Curriculum from Teacher’s Perspective: A Mixed-Methods Study. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 100190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100190
Osher, D., Cantor, P., Berg, J., Steyer, L., & Rose, T. (2020). Drivers of human development: How relationships and context shape learning and development1. Applied Developmental Science, 24(1), 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2017.1398650
Pande, M., & Bharathi, S. V. (2020). Theoretical foundations of design thinking – A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100637
Poquet, O., Kitto, K., Jovanovic, J., Dawson, S., Siemens, G., & Markauskaite, L. (2021). Transitions through lifelong learning: Implications for learning analytics. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100039
Putri, N. H., Yusuf, A., Prayuga, N. G. A. P., & Syafira, N. P. (2024). Learning Theory According To Humanistic Psychology And Its Implementation In Students. Progres Pendidikan, 5(1), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.29303/prospek.v5i1.542
Sain, Z. H., Aulia Luqman Aziz, & Moses Adeolu Agoi. (2024). Navigating Educational Challenges in Indonesia: Policy Recommendations for Future Success. Journal of Digital Learning and Distance Education, 3(4), 1038–1046. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v3i4.339
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Voogt, J., Laferrière, T., Breuleux, A., Itow, R. C., Hickey, D. T., & McKenney, S. (2015). Collaborative design as a form of professional development. Instructional Science, 43(2), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9340-7
Zovko, M.-É., & Dillon, J. (2018). Humanism vs. competency: Traditional and contemporary models of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(6–7), 554–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1375757
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL OF DIGITAL LEARNING AND DISTANCE EDUCATION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>.