The Influence of the Two Stay Two Stray Type Cooperative Learning Model on Students' Mathematics Learning Outcomes in Class VII of State Junior High School 1 Batangtoru, Indonesia
Article Sidebar
-
Two-stay two-stray, learning outcomes, Mathematics
Abstract
This research is motivated by the low mathematics learning outcomes of students in class VII of SMP Negeri 1 Batangtoru. One possible cause of the low student learning outcomes is the inappropriate learning model used by teachers in class so that students become passive in the learning process. The purpose of this study was to determine and analyze the effect of the Two Stay Two Stray cooperative learning model on the mathematics learning outcomes of class VII students of SMP Negeri 1 Batangtoru. This research is a quantitative study. The study involved two classes: the control class and the experimental class. The research instrument used a test. Data processing and analysis were conducted using the t-test. Based on the data analysis, the post-test questions given to students to measure students' cognitive abilities obtained an average value of 80.78 for the experimental class and 70.78 for the control class. The results of the hypothesis testing indicate that the t-count is greater than the t-table, specifically 2.941 > 2.0369, with a significance level of 5%. So, the original idea was not supported, and instead, it was found that the two-stay, two-stray cooperative learning model significantly improved the math learning results for seventh-grade students at SMP Negeri 1 Batangtoru, Indonesia.
Full text article
References
Bąbel, P., Bajcar, E. A., Marchewka, K., & Sikora, K. (2018). Placebo Groups in Research on the Effectiveness of ABA Therapeutic Techniques. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1899. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01899
Bobrownicki, R., Carson, H. J., MacPherson, A. C., & Collins, D. (2022). Unloading the dice: Selection and design of comparison and control groups in controlled trials to enhance translational impact within motor learning and control research. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20(5), 1330–1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2021.1956567
Borgonovi, F., Pokropek, M., & Pokropek, A. (2023). Relations between academic boredom, academic achievement, ICT use, and teacher enthusiasm among adolescents. Computers & Education, 200, 104807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104807
Chen, L.-T., Wu, P.-J., & Peng, C.-Y. J. (2019). Accounting for baseline trends in intervention studies: Methods, effect sizes, and software. Cogent Psychology, 6(1), 1679941. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2019.1679941
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Emanuel, E. P. L., Kirana, A., & Chamidah, A. (2021). Enhancing students’ ability to solve word problems in Mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1832(1), 012056. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1832/1/012056
Faiqoh, S. N., & Asih, S. S. (2025). The Effectiveness of the Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) Cooperative Learning Model Compared to the Jigsaw Type on Students’ Science Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(2), 937–945. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i2.10491
Fandos-Herrera, C., Jiménez-Martínez, J., Orús, C., Pérez-Rueda, A., & Pina, J. M. (2023). The influence of personality on learning outcomes and attitudes: The case of discussants in the classroom. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(1), 100754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100754
Hünermund, P., Louw, B., & Rönkkö, M. (2025). The choice of control variables in empirical management research: How causal diagrams can inform the decision. The Leadership Quarterly, 36(2), 101845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2024.101845
Ismail, I., Hasanuddin, H., & Chandra, A. (2023). The Influence of Thinking Styles and Learning Styles on Student Learning Achievement. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(1), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.2896
Johnston, R., Jones, K., & Manley, D. (2018). Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: A cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behaviour. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1957–1976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0584-6
Lee, Y.-C. (2025). Changes in Learning Outcomes of Students Participating in Problem-Based Learning for the First Time: A Case Study of a Financial Management Course. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34(1), 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00873-y
Pinto, J. C., & Costa-Ramalho, S. (2023). Effects of service-learning as opposed to traditional teaching-learning contexts: A pilot study with three different courses. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1185469. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1185469
Rista, R., Yolanda, F., Andrian, D., & Sthephani, A. (2022). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) Pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar Di Kelas VIII SMP: Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) Pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar Di Kelas VIII SMP. Perspektif Pendidikan Dan Keguruan, 13(2), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.25299/perspektif.2022.vol13(2).10185
Schwichow, M., Brandenburger, M., & Wilbers, J. (2022). Analysis of experimental design errors in elementary school: How do students identify, interpret, and justify controlled and confounded experiments? International Journal of Science Education, 44(1), 91–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.2015544
Slocum, T. A., Pinkelman, S. E., Joslyn, P. R., & Nichols, B. (2022). Threats to Internal Validity in Multiple-Baseline Design Variations. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 45(3), 619–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-022-00326-1
Świder, K., & Bąbel, P. (2016). The Effect of the Type and Colour of Placebo Stimuli on Placebo Effects Induced by Observational Learning. PLOS ONE, 11(6), e0158363. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158363
Vuyk, A., Montania, M., & Barrios, L. (2024). Boredom and its perceived impact in adolescents with exceptional mathematical talent: A sequential mixed-methods study in Paraguay. Frontiers in Sociology, 9, 1214878. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1214878
Wei, X., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2021). Assessment of cognitive, behavioral, and affective learning outcomes in massive open online courses: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 163, 104097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104097
Zhang, H., Su, S., Zeng, Y., & Lam, J. F. I. (2022). An Experimental Study on the Effectiveness of Students’ Learning in Scientific Courses through Constructive Alignment—A Case Study from an MIS Course. Education Sciences, 12(5), 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050338
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL OF DIGITAL LEARNING AND DISTANCE EDUCATION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>.