Process Skills through Student Worksheet Based on Around Nature in Materials Temperature and Heat
Article Sidebar
-
process skills, student worksheet
Abstract
Physics is the knowledge that studies physical events that include processes, products, and scientific attitudes that are cyclic, and interconnected, and explains how natural phenomena are measured through observation and research. The learning outcomes of students' Physics process skills could not be said to be fully successful. This study aims to describe and determine the differences in students' physics process skills through the LKS based on Natural Exploration (JAS) on the subject matter of temperature and heat at SMAN 2 XIII Koto Kampar. The research design used in this study was an intact-group comparison design. The data collection technique in this study was giving tests to the experimental class and control class, after learning through LKS based on Exploring the Surroundings. The average absorption power of the experimental class is 80% in the good category, while the control class is 74% in the good category. Based on students' absorption, it can be said that the effectiveness of learning in the experimental class and control class is effective. Classical student learning completeness in the experimental class is 84% and in the control class is 62.5% otherwise incomplete. The classical completeness of the process skill indicator in the experimental class is 100% and in the control class is 75%. In classical completeness, the indicator of process skills in the experimental class is declared complete and the control class is declared incomplete. After the t-test was conducted, it was found that there was a significant difference in physics process skills through LKS based on Exploring the Surroundings by using ordinary LKS.
Full text article
References
Coman, C., Țîru, L. G., Meseșan-Schmitz, L., Stanciu, C., & Bularca, M. C. (2020). Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic: Students’ Perspective. Sustainability, 12(24), 10367. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410367
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Deta, U. A., Prakoso, I., Agustina, P. Z. R., Fadillah, R. N., Lestari, N. A., Yantidewi, M., Admoko, S., Zainuddin, A., Nurlailiyah, A., & Prahani, B. K. (2020). Science Process Skills Profile of Non-Science Undergraduate Students in Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1491(1), 012067. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1491/1/012067
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges, and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice, and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Flegr, S., Kuhn, J., & Scheiter, K. (2023). When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts: Combining real and virtual experiments in science education. Computers & Education, 197, 104745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104745
Ganie, R., . D., & Rangkuti, R. (2019). Reading Comprehension Problems on English Texts Faced By High School Students in Medan. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i19.4896
Hong, J.-C., Tsai, C.-R., Hsiao, H.-S., Chen, P.-H., Chu, K.-C., Gu, J., & Sitthiworachart, J. (2019). The effect of the “Prediction-observation-quiz-explanation” inquiry-based e-learning model on flow experience in green energy learning. Computers & Education, 133, 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.009
Jensen, J. L., Holt, E. A., Sowards, J. B., Heath Ogden, T., & West, R. E. (2018). Investigating Strategies for Pre-Class Content Learning in a Flipped Classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(6), 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9740-6
Jirout, J. J. (2020). Supporting Early Scientific Thinking Through Curiosity. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1717. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01717
Ketut Sudarsana, I., Bagus Made Anggara Putra, I., Nyoman Temon Astawa, I., & Wayan Lali Yogantara, I. (2019). The use of Google Classroom in the learning process. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1175, 012165. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012165
Lodge, J. M., Kennedy, G., Lockyer, L., Arguel, A., & Pachman, M. (2018). Understanding Difficulties and Resulting Confusion in Learning: An Integrative Review. Frontiers in Education, 3, 49. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00049
Muhtadi, A., Wahyuningsih, D., & Sidabutar, M. (2021). The Effectiveness of Online Learning Model Implementation. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v6i2.10012
Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Panigrahi, P. K. (2021). Effectiveness of e-learning: The mediating role of student engagement on perceived learning effectiveness. Information Technology & People, 34(7), 1840–1862. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2019-0380
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Prahani, B. K., Suprapto, N., Suliyanah, Lestari, N. A., Jauhariyah, M. N. R., Admoko, S., & Wahyuni, S. (2018). The effectiveness of the collaborative problem-based physics learning (CPBPL) model in improving student’s self-confidence in physics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 997, 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/997/1/012008
Ridlo, S., Ngabekti, S., Isnaeni, W., & Prasetyo, A. P. B. (2019). Natural experience approach in science learning: An impact study of socialization to the science teacher. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(3), 032098. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/032098
Siahaan, P., Suryani, A., Kaniawati, I., Suhendi, E., & Samsudin, A. (2017). Improving Students’ Science Process Skills through Simple Computer Simulations on Linear Motion Conceptions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812, 012017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012017
Sun, Y., Sun, Q., & Qin, K. (2021). Physics-Based Deep Learning for Flow Problems. Energies, 14(22), 7760. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14227760
Tucny, J.-M., Durve, M., Montessori, A., & Succi, S. (2024). Learning of viscosity functions in rarefied gas flows with physics-informed neural networks. Computers & Fluids, 269, 106114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2023.106114
Authors
Copyright (c) 2022 JOURNAL OF DIGITAL LEARNING AND DISTANCE EDUCATION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>.