Spatiotemporal Water Quality Modeling Using Deep Learning Architectures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56778/rjslr.v3i3.519Keywords:
Water Quality Index (WQI), Spatiotemporal Modeling, Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA), Explainable AI (XAI), Deep Learning (DL), DBSCAN, XGBoostAbstract
Water quality monitoring is vital for ensuring public health, environmental sustainability, and economic resilience. Traditional monitoring techniques, while precise, often fall short due to high costs, labor intensity, and limited temporal and spatial resolution barriers that are increasingly critical amid accelerating urbanization, climate change, and pollution. This study explores the application of deep learning architectures to spatiotemporal water quality modeling, leveraging diverse datasets comprising historical records, sensor readings, and government sources. Supervised learning techniques were evaluated for predictive and classification tasks, including Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forests, XGBoost, and Decision Trees. SVR yielded strong regression performance for Water Quality Index (WQI) prediction with an R² of 0.9693 and low mean squared error, while XGBoost and Decision Trees demonstrated robust classification accuracy above 94%, with Decision Trees excelling in macro-averaged metrics. Unsupervised learning using DBSCAN revealed moderate clustering potential, but also emphasized the limitations of density-based approaches for noisy environmental data. Exploratory analyses offered insights into parameter distributions and interdependencies, including Kernel Density Estimation, correlation heatmaps, box plots, PCA, and t-SNE. While the study confirms the potential of AI in water quality monitoring, it also underscores challenges such as data imbalance, limited minority class precision, and the need for interpretable and scalable models. Future work should integrate explainable AI, edge computing, and hybrid domain-informed models to foster real-time, equitable, and sustainable water monitoring solutions aligned with SDG 6. This research demonstrates the promise of deep learning in transitioning water quality management from reactive to predictive paradigms.
References
Archit Nandan. (2024). Water Quality Prediction Data Analytics Project [Dataset]. Kaggle online data repository. https://www.kaggle.com/code/architnandan/water-quality-prediction-data-analytics-project/input
Belyadi, H., & Haghighat, A. (2021). Supervised learning. In Machine Learning Guide for Oil and Gas Using Python (pp. 169–295). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821929-4.00004-4
Bhuria, R., Gill, K. S., Upadhyay, D., & Devliyal, S. (2024). Predicting Water Purity by Riding the Ensemble Waves with Gradient Boosting Classification Technique. 2024 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Computing and Smart Systems (ICSCSS), 1365–1368. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSCSS60660.2024.10624936
Cai, J., Xu, K., Zhu, Y., Hu, F., & Li, L. (2020). Prediction and analysis of net ecosystem carbon exchange based on gradient boosting regression and random forest. Applied Energy, 262, 114566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114566
Chauhan, R., Shukla, S., Pokhriyal, S., Devliyal, S., & Kumar, R. R. (2024). Enhancement of Usability of AI Chatbots using Machine Learning. 2024 Asia Pacific Conference on Innovation in Technology (APCIT), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/APCIT62007.2024.10673475
Getachew, B., & Manjunatha, B. R. (2022). Impacts of Land‐Use Change on the Hydrology of Lake Tana Basin, Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia. Global Challenges, 6(8), 2200041. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202200041
He, M., Qian, Q., Liu, X., Zhang, J., & Curry, J. (2024). Recent Progress on Surface Water Quality Models Utilizing Machine Learning Techniques. Water, 16(24), 3616. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16243616
Huang, R., Yu, C., Wang, H., Zhang, S., Wang, L., Li, H., Zhang, Z., & Zhou, Z. (2024). Spatial and Temporal Modeling on Energy Consumption of Wastewater Treatment Based on Machine Learning Algorithms. ACS ES&T Water, 4(3), 1119–1130. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.3c00430
LCRA. (2025). Water Quality Indicators. Lower Colorado River Authority. https://www.lcra.org/water/quality/colorado-river-watch-network/water-quality-indicators/
Leggesse, E. S., Zimale, F. A., Sultan, D., Enku, T., Srinivasan, R., & Tilahun, S. A. (2023). Predicting Optical Water Quality Indicators from Remote Sensing Using Machine Learning Algorithms in Tropical Highlands of Ethiopia. Hydrology, 10(5), 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10050110
Malakar, P., Sarkar, S., Mukherjee, A., Bhanja, S., & Sun, A. Y. (2021). Use of machine learning and deep learning methods in groundwater. In Global Groundwater (pp. 545–557). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818172-0.00040-2
More, K. S., & Wolkersdorfer, C. (2022). Predicting and Forecasting Mine Water Parameters Using a Hybrid Intelligent System. Water Resources Management, 36(8), 2813–2826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03177-2
Oise, G. P., Konyeha, C. C., Onwuzo, C. J., Otega, E. P., Akilo, B. E., Comfort, O. T., Odimayomi, J. A., & Belinda, U. N. (2025). Interpretable air quality classification for public health using machine learning. Advances in Computing and Engineering, 5(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.21622/ACE.2025.05.2.1428
Oise, G. P., & Konyeha, S. (2025). Optimization of E-Waste Sorting Process Using Deep Learning. Radinka Journal Of Science And Systematic Literature Review, 3(2), 612–622. https://doi.org/10.56778/rjslr.v3i2.503
Oise, G. P., Nwabuokei, O. C., Akpowehbve, O. J., Eyitemi, B. A., & Unuigbokhai, N. B. (2025). Towards Smarter Cyber Defense: Leveraging Deep Learning For Threat Identification And Prevention. Fudma Journal Of Sciences, 9(3), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2025-0903-3264
Pereira, E., Santos, J., & Barboza, E. (2024). Comparing TinyML Models and Libraries for On-Device Water Potability Classification. 2024 XIV Brazilian Symposium on Computing Systems Engineering (SBESC), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SBESC65055.2024.10771818
Peterson, K. T., Sagan, V., & Sloan, J. J. (2020). Deep learning-based water quality estimation and anomaly detection using Landsat-8/Sentinel-2 virtual constellation and cloud computing. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 57(4), 510–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2020.1738061
Shukla, Ms. G., & Verma, S. B. (2024). An In-Depth Analysis of Current Development in Energy Efficient Method for MAC Protocol to Extend Life Span of WSN. 2024 International Conference on Cybernation and Computation (CYBERCOM), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/CYBERCOM63683.2024.10803259
Varela Pérez, P., Greiner, B. E., & Von Cossel, M. (2022). Socio-Economic and Environmental Implications of Bioenergy Crop Cultivation on Marginal African Drylands and Key Principles for a Sustainable Development. Earth, 3(2), 652–682. https://doi.org/10.3390/earth3020038
Yin, J., Medellín-Azuara, J., Escriva-Bou, A., & Liu, Z. (2021). Bayesian machine learning ensemble approach to quantify model uncertainty in predicting groundwater storage change. Science of The Total Environment, 769, 144715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144715
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 RADINKA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>.



