Toward Learning Tools: Analyzing Precision of Tool Maker and Optical Comparator

Authors

  • Salvador Gracilla JR Technological University of the Philippines-Manila, Philippines
  • Angelo Henry Abellar Technological University of the Philippines-Manila, Philippines
  • Marvin Cenidoza Technological University of the Philippines-Manila, Philippines
  • Christian Russel Cerzo Technological University of the Philippines-Manila, Philippines
  • Kim Laurence Del Agua Technological University of the Philippines-Manila, Philippines
  • John Michael Ton R. Endozo Technological University of the Philippines-Manila, Philippines
  • John Rick Hapita Technological University of the Philippines-Manila, Philippines
  • August G. Igat Technological University of the Philippines-Manila, Philippines
  • Aldrin MAÑALAC Technological University of the Philippines-Manila, Philippines
  • Jason Pamilacan Technological University of the Philippines-Manila, Philippines
  • Cyrus Vrylle Quintos Technological University of the Philippines-Manila, Philippines
  • Aivhan John Quilondrino Technological University of the Philippines-Manila, Philippines
  • Marie Jo Tess Ragos Instructor, Technological University of the Philippines-Manila, Philippines
  • Cynic Tenedero Instructor, Technological University of the Philippines-Manila, Philippines
  • Leon Mendigorin DOST-UPB Social Innovation Laboratory and Business Inclusion (SILBI), Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56778/rjslr.v2i3.332

Keywords:

Tool Maker, Optical Comparator, precision, workpiece point, Technological University of the Philippines

Abstract

This paper aims to provide a clear analysis to choose what is the best tool for their specific needs. This is a quantitative descriptive correlation study that determines the difference in terms of accuracy and precision of optical comparator and toolmaker. Two different materials were measured using an optical comparator and tool maker microscope at the Technological University of the Philippines Manila Campus. Technological University of the Philippines is one of the schools in the Philippines that uses the equipment. Two measuring machines can be located at the College of Industrial Technology (CIT), Mechanical Engineering Technology Department (MET). This location was chosen for its highly efficient and calibrated machines to come up with accurate results. Both machines are significantly useful to industry and companies. Toolmaker microscope is a bit complicated while optical comparator has very slight difference to its measurements. However, the optical comparator is less costly than that of a toolmaker’s microscope. This paper has navigated the complexity of both tool maker's microscope and optical comparators that offer great accuracy and precision in terms of measuring small components that are used in the manufacturing process to make products.

References

Achouch, M., Dimitrova, M., Ziane, K., Sattarpanah Karganroudi, S., Dhouib, R., Ibrahim, H., & Adda, M. (2022). On Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0: Overview, Models, and Challenges. Applied Sciences, 12(16), 8081. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12168081

Aldoseri, A., Al-Khalifa, K. N., & Hamouda, A. M. (2023). Re-Thinking Data Strategy and Integration for Artificial Intelligence: Concepts, Opportunities, and Challenges. Applied Sciences, 13(12), 7082. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13127082

Arafat, M. Y., Alam, M. M., & Moh, S. (2023). Vision-Based Navigation Techniques for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Review and Challenges. Drones, 7(2), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7020089

Arena, F., Collotta, M., Pau, G., & Termine, F. (2022). An Overview of Augmented Reality. Computers, 11(2), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers11020028

Barrat, J.-L., Del Gado, E., Egelhaaf, S. U., Mao, X., Dijkstra, M., Pine, D. J., Kumar, S. K., Bishop, K., Gang, O., Obermeyer, A., Papadakis, C. M., Tsitsilianis, C., Smalyukh, I. I., Hourlier-Fargette, A., Andrieux, S., Drenckhan, W., Wagner, N., Murphy, R. P., Weeks, E. R., … Kwon, J. (2024). Soft matter roadmap*. Journal of Physics: Materials, 7(1), 012501. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7639/ad06cc

Bi, G., Chen, X., Yang, Z., & Ma, A. (2018). The measuring method for actual total magnification of metallographic microscope—Digital image method. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 397, 012148. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/397/1/012148

Da Silva, L. M., Da Silveira, A. B., Monticelli, J. M., & Kretschmer, C. (2023). Microfoundations of dynamic coopetition capabilities in firms from a microbrewery cluster. Revista de Gestão, 30(2), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-04-2021-0064

Faganel, A., & Rižnar, I. (2023). The Growth in Demand for Craft Beer and the Proliferation of Microbreweries in Slovenia. Beverages, 9(4), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages9040086

Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Suman, R., & Gonzalez, E. S. (2022). Understanding the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies in improving environmental sustainability. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.01.008

Jouini, N., Ruslan, M. S. M., Ghani, J. A., & Che Haron, C. H. (2023). Sustainable High-Speed Milling of Magnesium Alloy AZ91D in Dry and Cryogenic Conditions. Sustainability, 15(4), 3760. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043760

Kamińska, D., Sapiński, T., Wiak, S., Tikk, T., Haamer, R., Avots, E., Helmi, A., Ozcinar, C., & Anbarjafari, G. (2019). Virtual Reality and Its Applications in Education: Survey. Information, 10(10), 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10100318

Kuang, F.-L., Yuan, R.-Y., Wang, Q.-H., & Li, L. (2020). Large zooming range adaptive microscope employing tunable objective and eyepiece. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 14644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71507-8

Liu, L., Wang, X., Yang, X., Liu, H., Li, J., & Wang, P. (2023). Path planning techniques for mobile robots: Review and prospect. Expert Systems with Applications, 227, 120254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120254

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Reigoto, A. M., Andrade, S. A., Seixas, M. C. R. R., Costa, M. L., & Mermelstein, C. (2021). A comparative study on the use of microscopy in pharmacology and cell biology research. PLOS ONE, 16(1), e0245795. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245795

Reinartz, W., Wiegand, N., & Imschloss, M. (2019). The impact of digital transformation on the retailing value chain. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 36(3), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.12.002

Rita, P., Oliveira, T., & Farisa, A. (2019). The impact of e-service quality and customer satisfaction on customer behavior in online shopping. Heliyon, 5(10), e02690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02690

Soori, M., Ghaleh Jough, F. K., Dastres, R., & Arezoo, B. (2024). Sustainable CNC machining operations, a review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 5, 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2024.01.001

Tuli, N. T., Khatun, S., & Rashid, A. B. (2024). Unlocking the future of precision manufacturing: A comprehensive exploration of 3D printing with fiber-reinforced composites in aerospace, automotive, medical, and consumer industries. Heliyon, 10(5), e27328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27328

Weber, M., & Huisken, J. (2021). Multidisciplinarity Is Critical to Unlock the Full Potential of Modern Light Microscopy. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 9, 739015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.739015

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Gracilla, S., Angelo Henry ABELLAR, Marvin CENIDOZA, Christian Russel CERZO, Kim Laurence Del AGUA, John Michael Ton R. ENDOZO, John Rick HAPITA, August G. IGAT, Aldrin MAÑALAC, Jason Pamilacan, Cyrus Vrylle QUINTOS, Aivhan John QUILONDRINO, Marie Jo Tess RAGOS, Cynic TENEDERO, & Leon MENDIGORIN. (2024). Toward Learning Tools: Analyzing Precision of Tool Maker and Optical Comparator. RADINKA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW, 2(3), 462–468. https://doi.org/10.56778/rjslr.v2i3.332