Asset Recovery in Corruption Crimes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56778/rjslr.v2i1.297Keywords:
TIPIKOR, return asset, recoveryAbstract
Efforts to return stolen state assets (stolen asset recovery) through criminal acts of corruption (TIPIKOR) tend not to be easy to carry out. Corruption perpetrators have extraordinarily wide and difficult access to hide or launder money from the proceeds of their criminal acts of corruption. The problem becomes increasingly difficult for recovery efforts because the haven for the proceeds of crime extends beyond the borders of the country where the criminal act of corruption was committed. This research aims to determine the mechanism for returning assets in criminal acts of corruption through criminal channels. The type of research used is normative research, and the data collection technique is library research. The research results show that the mechanism for returning assets in criminal acts of corruption through criminal channels has four stages: tracking assets, freezing or confiscating assets, confiscating assets, and returning and handing over assets to the victim's country.
References
Birkett, D. J. (2020). Asset Freezing at the European and Inter-American Courts of Human Rights: Lessons for the International Criminal Court, the United Nations Security Council and States. Human Rights Law Review, 20(3), 502–525. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngaa022
Di Nicola, A. (2022). Towards digital organized crime and digital sociology of organized crime. Trends in Organized Crime. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-022-09457-y
Djuma, L. (2023). Investigation of The Effectiveness of Use of YouTube As A Learning Resource. 12 Waiheru, 9(2), 197–201. https://doi.org/10.47655/12waiheru.v9i2.162
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Faharuddin, R. & Jefferson Hakim. (2023). Restorative Justice for Corruption Cases the Settlement of Corruption Cases: Is it Possible? Yuridika, 38(1), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i1.42511
Firmansyah, F., Santoso, T., Febrian, F., & Nashriana, N. (2020). Reconstruction to Prove Elements of Detrimental to State Finances in the Criminal Act of Corruption in Indonesia. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v8i3.18295
Howard-Hassmann, R. E. (2013). Reconsidering the Right to Own Property. Journal of Human Rights, 12(2), 180–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2013.784667
Jacobs, H. M. (2010). Social conflict over property rights: The end, a new beginning, or a continuing debate? Housing Policy Debate, 20(3), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511481003788760
Jemberie, M. A. (2016). Enhanced Forms of Criminal Investigation: Analysis on Its Potential Risks to Human Rights. Beijing Law Review, 07(01), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2016.71004
Kholik, I., . E., Ekaputra, M., & Mulyadi, M. (2024). Confiscation of Personal Assets of Corruption Defendants in a Positive Legal Perspective. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i21.14743
Mamak, K., Barczak-Oplustil, A., Kwiatkowski, D., Małecki, M., & Zając, D. (2022). Should gains from criminal knowledge be forfeited? Crime, Law and Social Change, 77(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-021-09994-7
Meneghini, C., & Calderoni, F. (2022). Co-offending and Criminal Careers in Organized Crime. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 8(3), 337–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-022-00202-1
Muhammad Sofyan, A. (2019). Corporate Prosecution in Criminal Acts of Corruption: Opportunity and Challenge. Mulawarman Law Review, 105–115. https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v4i2.67
Ndaomanu, M. (2023). Claims for the Rights of Third Parties in Good Faith Against Confiscation of Goods in Corruption Criminal Decisions. Unnes Law Journal, 9(2), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v9i2.75565
Prøitz, T. S., Mausethagen, S., & Skedsmo, G. (2017). Investigative modes in research on data use in education. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 3(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2017.1326280
Ruhaeni, N., & Aqimuddin, E. A. (2023). Halal food certification as an exception clause under the rule of the WTO-GATT: An Indonesia experience. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 2260160. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2260160
Sakellaraki, A. (2022). EU Asset Recovery and Confiscation Regime – Quo Vadis ? A First Assessment of the Commission’s Proposal to Further Harmonise the EU Asset Recovery and Confiscation Laws. A Step in the Right Direction? New Journal of European Criminal Law, 13(4), 478–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844221139577
Saputri, A. S. (2023). The Urgency and Mechanism of Asset Return for Corruption Crimes. International Journal of Social Service and Research, 3(4), 906–910. https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i4.347
Sinurat, A. (2024). The Existence of Criminal Fine and Payment of Replacement Money in Enforcing Corruption Criminal Laws in the Corruption Court in Kupang, Indonesia. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(1), e3148. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.3149
Utari, I. S., Ramada, D. P., Arifin, R., & Smith, R. B. (2023). Legal Protection for Children as Victims of Economic Exploitation: Problems and Challenges in Three Major ASEAN Countries (Indonesia, Vietnam and Philippines). Lex Scientia Law Review, 7(2), 771–842. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v7i2.68301
Van Oorschot, R. A., Ballantyne, K. N., & Mitchell, R. J. (2010). Forensic trace DNA: A review. Investigative Genetics, 1(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-2223-1-14
Van Uhm, D. P., & Nijman, R. C. C. (2022). The convergence of environmental crime with other serious crimes: Subtypes within the environmental crime continuum. European Journal of Criminology, 19(4), 542–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370820904585
Wahyudi, S. (2019). Penal Policy on Assets Recovery on Corruption Cases in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 4(1), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v4i01.28224
Wibawa, K. C. S., Saraswati, R., & Ispriyarso, B. (2023). Measuring the Policy of Public Information Disclosure to Adapt Climate Change in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1270(1), 012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1270/1/012011
Widayanti, T. F., Djafar, E. M., Hakim, M. Z., Rivanie, S. S., & Ashri, M. (2022). Legal protection concerning marine environment and coastal areas in Indonesia based on the convention on biological diversity (CBD). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1119(1), 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1119/1/012006
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 RADINKA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>.
